Balancing The Realities of ‘Free Trial’ Tension

We provide leads and sales to clients through marketing, advertising and sometimes on a pay-for-performance (P4P) basis. We also provide short advertising trials to see if the lead generation will be mutually profitable.

For P4P partnerships, in particular, there’s an inherent tension built into a free trial. On the one hand, we bring a productive mix to the table:

  • Marketing and testing experience
  • Ad technology
  • Data science
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Video production
  • Lead generation and sales systems

The above outlines a few of the services we provide for the mutual benefit of sales growth for your company and ours.

On the other hand, the reality of how fast and in what volume the increased revenue will materialize is based upon a number of factors outside of our control. Two such factors represent key client obligations:

  • Converting the leads to sales
  • Operational productivity

And that doesn’t even include the fact that on our end optimizing the marketing and advertising is an ongoing process and the cost-per-lead is highest in the beginning until data science, artificial intelligence and continual testing start to point the way to more effective advertising.


In the short term, inherent tension rides along with the unanswered question: “Will there be enough sales to support both your company’s growth as well as the work we provide?” And to make the matter more complex, almost all clients believe the answer to be an inarguable “YES!” The good news is sometimes they’re right. The bad news for us is that sometimes they’re not.

The fact is, the amount of labor that can be invested to run innumerable marketing and advertising tests to build and optimize a sales funnel to generate more leads/sales for less cost is an ongoing process. And yet some of the heaviest efforts are in the very beginning.

The marketing and optimization process begins within the first month, but may not be mature for months, a year, or even years, depending upon the number of products and services in any one company, as well as the level of competition.


There’s much in the way of testing that can be conducted:

  • headline testing
  • benefit testing
  • keyword testing
  • offer testing
  • price testing
  • guarantee testing
  • seasonal testing
  • ad format testing
  • image testing
  • story testing
  • all manner of video testing
  • and endless landing page testing

So begs another question: “How much labor should be executed now for an unknown payoff later?”


If the advertising shows great potential early on, then it makes sense to pour on the coals and invest more labor to increase sales as fast as possible.

If the advertising and partnership demonstrate below-average potential, then the sooner we bow out of the relationship the better.

But if in fact, the real-world numbers demonstrate an average P4P remuneration, there’s always that nagging reality that we would be better served seeking greener pastures.

Or to put it bluntly, if a partnership doesn’t show proportional benefit for both sides of the arrangement, then the tension will inevitably stretch to a point that favors a break in the collaboration.

And usually, it’s incumbent on our end to initiate that severance.

Of course, since we are investing more labor in the initial trial than the client is investing in media costs, we’re assuming the majority of the risk. And typically, the trial is not going to be profitable on our end, even if it might be for the client.

But that’s not the purpose of the initial trial anyway.


The purpose of the initial trial is simply to evaluate real-world advertising and sales data to ascertain further partnership potential. From that data, we can extrapolate how quickly a profitable partnership might be realized.

That means for trials, the responsibility is primarily on our end to evaluate if it even makes sense to go through such a brief testing period.

If there’s enough ancillary data available that suggests that the probability of a trial will not be mutually productive, then of course we won’t initiate a trial at all. But that also means accepting that sometimes the data will not paint the whole picture and we will have missed a good opportunity.

What all this means is that if you receive a decline from Skyworks Marketing about proceeding with a P4P trial, please be aware that such a decline is not an opinion about the success potential of your business, but merely an evaluation of the short term probability for a win-win P4P partnership based upon our processes and models.