<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Basics of Link Building for SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skyworksmarketing.com/the-basics-of-link-building-for-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skyworksmarketing.com/the-basics-of-link-building-for-seo/</link>
	<description>Pay-for-Performance Leads &#38; Sales Generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:16:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhoenixRising</title>
		<link>http://skyworksmarketing.com/the-basics-of-link-building-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>PhoenixRising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 16:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skyworksmarketing.com/?p=3409#comment-632</guid>
		<description>Rewriting has the potential too however, yeah I have to agree it&#039;s not as powerful as original content. Though if it&#039;s well written stuff then I don&#039;t see why. 

As a writer, the only thing that I get really ticked off over when it comes to SEO writing is keywords. I know we&#039;re supposed to keep it low and all but it just sucks when I run into obviously stuffed articles. 

Sure they bring in clients and all due to the SEO keywords but it&#039;s a turn off really. 

I think putting a human element still in the writing, without being too obvious about the business/marketing behind it should be considered. 

I don&#039;t think it should be compromised just so you can rake in cash, the whole &#039;human element&#039; is just as profitable too you know. Customers love it when you make them feel like they&#039;re with someone warm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rewriting has the potential too however, yeah I have to agree it&#8217;s not as powerful as original content. Though if it&#8217;s well written stuff then I don&#8217;t see why. </p>
<p>As a writer, the only thing that I get really ticked off over when it comes to SEO writing is keywords. I know we&#8217;re supposed to keep it low and all but it just sucks when I run into obviously stuffed articles. </p>
<p>Sure they bring in clients and all due to the SEO keywords but it&#8217;s a turn off really. </p>
<p>I think putting a human element still in the writing, without being too obvious about the business/marketing behind it should be considered. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it should be compromised just so you can rake in cash, the whole &#8216;human element&#8217; is just as profitable too you know. Customers love it when you make them feel like they&#8217;re with someone warm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChaoticDissonance</title>
		<link>http://skyworksmarketing.com/the-basics-of-link-building-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>ChaoticDissonance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 17:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skyworksmarketing.com/?p=3409#comment-635</guid>
		<description>Keywords are definitely here to stay without a doubt. 

They&#039;ll last a long while from now, as a business tool. Prior to all these, keywords were reserved to planning and reporting, not actual business measures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords are definitely here to stay without a doubt. </p>
<p>They&#8217;ll last a long while from now, as a business tool. Prior to all these, keywords were reserved to planning and reporting, not actual business measures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HallowedCacophony</title>
		<link>http://skyworksmarketing.com/the-basics-of-link-building-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>HallowedCacophony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skyworksmarketing.com/?p=3409#comment-639</guid>
		<description>OH. So that&#039;s what back linking/link building is? I wasn&#039;t aware I&#039;ve been seeing and encountering it for quite some time until I knew what it was called now. 

They&#039;re embedded links on the net that refer one to a specific website. Usually works hand in hand with keywords, if they&#039;re in articles. Can be done through other means as well though.

I remembered someone asking if I knew how to go about it and said I didn&#039;t.

What a waste!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH. So that&#8217;s what back linking/link building is? I wasn&#8217;t aware I&#8217;ve been seeing and encountering it for quite some time until I knew what it was called now. </p>
<p>They&#8217;re embedded links on the net that refer one to a specific website. Usually works hand in hand with keywords, if they&#8217;re in articles. Can be done through other means as well though.</p>
<p>I remembered someone asking if I knew how to go about it and said I didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>What a waste!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

